In 1959, one of the most mysterious tragedies of the past century occurred in the Urals. A group of young tourists on the slope of the mountain was faced with a spontaneous force, which they were not able to overcome, and as a result, all nine people died. What exactly happened there – a riddle to this day, but Kholat developers offer us to touch the secret and independently explore the ill -fated pass. Look for the conclusions of our expedition in the video review.
Kholat
The best comments
Soul overview.
There are several documentary films dedicated to the tragedy. Perhaps the most interesting of them, where several versions were examined in detail by a television agency of the Urals.
www.YouTube.COM/Watch?V = EARQRL6XLN4
www.YouTube.COM/Watch?v = jql806jxgcm
Well, the most believable itself is actually: the one that the glacier is gathering explains a lot, for example, why people have damage, why the tent was spores from the inside and t.D.
This version is incredible because
1) Almost all warm clothes remained near the tent, it is stupid to go into cold darkness without warm things.
2) Almost the entire group died near the cedar half a kilometer from the tent, to which it is still necessary to wander with fractures
3) damage caused to some members, the glacier could not cause purely physically
Personally, I adhere to the version presented here Murders.ru/dyatloff_group_1.HTML. Not reading there for one day, but it is worth it, in realism the most believable of all.
Near the cedar only two people died who tried to warm up by the fire. Two more people died on the slope on the way between the cedar and the tent. They all had any damage.
Serious injuries were found only in those who were found in a stream. The nature of the traces of the tent is as if they would go, holding the wounded under the arms. I can’t judge about the nature of the injuries – I’m not a court. honey. expert. It seems to me that the version with an avalanche is quite wealthy, although it has its own shortcomings (like all versions itself).
The option with control delivery to Americans of infected clothing is of course interesting, but more like a journalist investigation on REN-TV)
Why unfortunately not too long? You yourself in the review clearly and clearly explained that if it is long, then the player will be shed and the design of the locations and the engine, in my opinion, will not save it. Impressions should be bright. For example, I played the same, I do not know 5 hours, and after the game you say: “Cool adventure”. Not a protractedness seems to me only in a plus.
In theory, if it is not too long, then the toy should not be sown. Isn’t it like that? If it were too long, then the uniformity in most cases will swing the player with his head, and here, I believe, it does not last so long. And according to your sayings, it becomes clear that if you know how to focus on the map very well, then the game can be faster? Right?
Geographic felonism is about me, so I won’t even try … I manage to get lost in the quests.
Atmospheric review turned out ..
As always, I made it out on the shelves, but … after your story from all my heart, I believed that you would put it amazing. Even on the frames from the game, the same atmosphere was very felt, crowded with a sense of loneliness and despair. Eh ..
Damn, because of this intonation, I expected the phrase to end “Put a mug of tea next to you and wrap yourself in a blanket because on SG.ru will be scared and interesting now “..
After the introductory monologue, there was a persistent feeling that the phrase “History of the Silent Hill series” would be heard now.
And the game itself is a little Silent Hill: Shatteered Memories resembles. Can someone advise whether it is worth taking Kholat to a person who is inconsolably bored with Silent Hill.
P.S.
The advice, in the spirit of “better reproduce Silent Hill” you can not give, I counted here and it turned out that taking into account all parts, I passed Silent Hill 24 times.richprizecasino.uk